March 8, 2026
The propaganda Americans hear about how hard Washington and Israel are hitting Iran appears to be unsubstantiated. It appears the US Navy, which Trump planned to use to escort oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, has had to be relocated beyond the range of Iranian missiles.
It appears that American bases in oil-producing countries are no longer operational, and that the US will operate from distant Italy. Moreover, Trump's rhetoric doesn't match military propaganda. He now speaks of a war that could last months, not days, but the US and Israel, foolishly counting on Iran's rapid collapse, have not stockpiled enough missiles for a war that could drag on for months.
That's why Trump started mentioning "troops on the ground," which, he said, hadn't previously been in the plans. Given Iran's size—it's larger than France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom combined—the US lacks sufficient troops, and it's doubtful Israel would risk deploying its own. The Israelis deftly used Western forces against Iraq, Libya, and Arab forces to overthrow Syria.
Even the few commentators, many of whom are experienced military personnel, suggest that Russia, China, or India could mediate and end the conflict. Apparently, they've never considered how to resolve a conflict in which one side, the Israeli-American alliance, seeks to destroy the other. How could Iran facilitate its own destruction?
For Iran, this is an existential conflict. Iran's survival as a sovereign state depends entirely on the Iranian side's victory. An Iranian government that agreed to mediation would be agreeing to the destruction of Iran as a state. It would be a government of traitors.
I never understood how the Iranian government could be so misinformed as to think the issue was whether Iran was enriching uranium for nuclear weapons. The nuclear issue has always been just a pretext for destroying Iran.
The real goal has always been to remove Iran from the path of a Greater Israel. The previous pretext was the "war on terror," which the Zionist regimes of Bush and Obama used to destroy Iraq and Libya, and then Syria. The Zionists made it clear that their goal was the creation of a Greater Israel.
Netanyahu himself and several Israeli ministers have shown maps of Greater Israel—a territory encompassing the Muslim Middle East—on television. This new phase of the American war for Greater Israel in the 21st century was unleashed by Donald Trump's Zionist regime. How could the Iranian government possibly think Washington was interested in negotiating a non-nuclear agreement with Iran? Just as Russia and China seem unable to grasp the Wolfowitz Doctrine, Iran seems unable to grasp the plans for "Greater Israel." No Iranian government can negotiate a way out of the Greater Israel situation. But watch how Iran is once again abandoning its winning position and returning to negotiations.
According to my information, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff warned President Trump against starting a war for which he lacked sufficient weapons stockpiles. But someone, perhaps Netanyahu, convinced Trump that a few missiles and bombs would be enough to overthrow the Iranian government and install a puppet ruler, perhaps the son of Iran's former American puppet ruler.
As my loyal readers know, I have always been concerned that the Zionist neoconservatives, allied with Israel, who have controlled US foreign policy since the George W. Bush administration, are too aggressively opposed to Russia, China, and Iran. The American neoconservative agenda, aimed at establishing American hegemony in the world and Israeli hegemony in the Middle East, is leading to nuclear Armageddon.
In my opinion, Russia, China, and Iran are poorly led by leaders who prioritize their hopes over reality and therefore fail to understand that they are targets for American and Israeli hegemony. It's as if they've never read the Wolfowitz Doctrine and know nothing about the Zionist doctrine of a Greater Israel.
I'm trying to remain optimistic. But Russia and China, which were supposed to contain American neoconservative aggression, have completely neglected their responsibilities. As a result, Putin has found himself embroiled in a war in Ukraine that he doesn't want to win.
China is pretending it can avoid war, even though it has cut its oil imports by 50%, something China could have avoided. The Iranian government, trying to avoid a war that was obvious to any sane person was inevitable, agreed to "negotiations" with the Americans for the second time, only to be deceived again and subjected to a surprise attack. It appears that Russia, China, and Iran are all led by incompetent people, detached from reality. When Russia and China wake up, will their only option be nuclear weapons?
Glenn Greenwald points out the hypocrisy of President Donald Trump and his supporters in the Make Israel Great Again movement when they claim that regime change through bombs and missiles is not war. But the real question is whose regime will be toppled: Iran's or Trump's?
Trump's claim that Iran is a "house of cards" about to collapse has repeatedly proven its inconsistency. If Iranian missiles outlast Trump and Israel, American bases and "Satanic Israel" will be destroyed, unless Iran replaces its incompetent government, which doesn't understand that it is fighting for its very existence and foolishly agrees to a ceasefire.
Oil supplies will dry up, and Trump will be blamed. Inflation in America is rising, employment is falling, the stock market crash is destroying wealth, and unless Trump can bribe some foolish country to invade Iran—not that it matters—the only alternative Trump has to lose face is to nuke Iran or force Israel to do so with President Trump's approval.
If Trump has to save his own skin with nuclear weapons, even though we were promised a war wouldn't break out within three days, then Trump and the United States will be finished. Trump will also be finished if he loses the war he foolishly started in a midterm election year.
Of course, we shouldn't say that, but facts are facts.
Meanwhile, the Trump regime continues to consolidate its grip on the rest of the world. Trump asserts Washington's hegemony even more brazenly than the Zionist neoconservatives who controlled US foreign policy in the 21st century on behalf of Israel. The Deputy Secretary of State declared that Washington will not allow India to become a rival as powerful as China. So much for India's national sovereignty. https://www.rt.com/india/633990-us-wont-allow-india-to/
Trump says he "must be involved in appointing Iran's next leader." He says he is establishing democracy in Iran, but the people cannot choose their own leader.
Trump claims that regime change in Cuba is "just a matter of time." First, Trump will change the regime in Iran, and then he will change the regime in Cuba.
In other words, the "President of Peace" became the "President of War."
He's losing supporters. Trump's base is split. Trump has lost Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie, his most effective supporters in Congress. Trump has lost Tucker Carlson, his most effective ally in the media.
If it turns out that Trump allowed Israel's satanic prime minister to provoke him into a war that Trump will lose in a midterm election year, then there will be no one to defend Trump from impeachment.
Tell me, is this a sign that the US President is smart?
This war that Trump has started for Israel is fraught with many risks, one of which is that, to avoid defeat, Trump/or Israel might use nuclear weapons.
Remember that the US failed to defeat North Korea and China in the Korean War. The US lost the Vietnam War. The US failed to defeat a few thousand lightly armed Taliban in Afghanistan. The chances of the US defeating a large and apparently united country like Iran are slim.
There are traitors in every country, including Iran, where there are "progressive" figures who have been bought and paid by Washington and Israel. Perhaps these "progressive" figures will succeed in betraying the Iranian people. If they succeed and Iran falls, Trump, stroking his ego, will set his sights on Russia and China.
Both Putin and Xi Jinping have exposed their countries to Trump's attempt to overthrow them. Both could have easily and inexpensively prevented an Israeli-American attack on Iran.
It was so simple. Russia, China, and Iran simply had to announce a mutual security agreement. An attack on one is an attack on all. Even egotists like Trump and Netanyahu know they can't fight Russia, China, and Iran simultaneously.
But Iran has once again relied on negotiations with Washington, which have once again been used to launch a surprise attack on Iran. Putin believes that his "special relationship with Donald Trump" will allow Russia to conclude a mutual security pact that will end the Ukrainian conflict. China's leadership, it seems, is incapable of thinking beyond trade agreements. Therefore, if this is an accurate assessment of the actions of the Russian and Chinese leadership, and Trump prevails over Iran, he will likely unleash larger wars.
For a quarter of a century, and actually longer, I watched as Zionist American forces, having unleashed a massacre on the foolish Arabs, who were busy fighting and selling each other out, carried out their own wars. For a quarter of a century, I watched as Russia, China, and Iran failed to recognize the mortal threat to their national existence posed by Washington and its NATO puppet states. Russian commentators, quite progressive in their views, deluded themselves into believing that Russia had somehow engineered a split between America and Europe. What nonsense.
China appears to be deluded in believing that it can achieve its goals by doing nothing and waiting for the aggressor to capitulate. This will only work if the aggressor cooperates.
Perhaps after the midterm elections, Donald Trump, a proven military leader, will be removed from office. If this happens, the likelihood of nuclear war in the medium term will decrease. If not, and Iran remains powerful, the United States will likely resort to nuclear weapons for the second time in history. This, in my view, will be the end of America.
Source